KUGRDON Posted August 1, 2020 Share Posted August 1, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mano Posted August 1, 2020 Share Posted August 1, 2020 nm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KUGRDON Posted August 1, 2020 Share Posted August 1, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KUGRDON Posted August 1, 2020 Share Posted August 1, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clpp01 Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 Curious to see if this is the same stuff that Rudy Carpenter was tweeting out about a couple weeks ago, if so they might as well not waste anyone's time and just announce they are sitting out as those demands he listed would never be agreed to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBug708 Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 Opens up a weird set of circumstances. Does that mean they are employees, contract workers? If they violate team rules can they be fined, or terminated. If they fail to meet minimum academic standards, is their contract voided. I see the point of the players, but its a pretty slippery slope. Positive drug tests could invalidate their being paid. Curfew violations, conduct issues. They could put themselves under a serious microscope, because once pay is involved, expectations must be met for the employer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KUGRDON Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 That economic model probably only works in the SEC and B10 And at a smattering of other P5 schools. It would necessitate a consolidating restructuring of leagues. It’s coming, maybe not now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KUGRDON Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 This Retweet is totally without context. It was originally made in May and re-tweeted a few minutes ago. It could indicate some division among players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clpp01 Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 They released their "demands" and as expected half of it is a complete non starter so we will see if they will follow through with the threat of a boycott https://www.theplayerstribune.com/en-us/articles/pac-12-players-covid-19-statement-football-season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfmanhalfbronco Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 Lol, I hope the playoff committee takes into account the Pac 12 will be far and away the weakest P5 conference if their players miss fall camp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HLB Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 9 minutes ago, clpp01 said: They released their "demands" and as expected half of it is a complete non starter so we will see if they will follow through with the threat of a boycott https://www.theplayerstribune.com/en-us/articles/pac-12-players-covid-19-statement-football-season Let them boycott and move on. Don't let the tail wag the dog. Respond to the boycott as a breach of contract by withdrawing the scholarship, kick them out of school, and ban them from the campus. And what a bad time to threaten a boycott: In a scaled down season that might not see completion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HLB Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 5 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said: Lol, I hope the playoff committee takes into account the Pac 12 will be far and away the weakest P5 conference if their players miss fall camp. In recent years, the playoff committee has already taken into account that the PAC12 has been far and away the weakest P5 conference. This would be nothing new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorcho Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 58 minutes ago, halfmanhalfbronco said: Lol, I hope the playoff committee takes into account the Pac 12 will be far and away the weakest P5 conference if their players miss fall camp. are you that naive that you think this is only a PAC-12 issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glduck Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KUGRDON Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 The athletic is reporting that Some athletes at WSU informed WSU that they were going to opt out of playing this year. Those athletes were told That they would have their scholarships for next year but they would not be allowed to practice or be in team facilities. You can’t protect the team if non-team members are present. A lot of smoke in the air, hard to tell exactly what’s going on. The school is reporting that nobody was removed from the team because of “We are united.” So there is a distinction between the player opting out And leaving the team versus being cut. I don’t know how valid the distinction is, but the players still have their scholarships either way. its puzzling because the actions don’t sound like Rolo or Chun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KUGRDON Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 Another source indicating Woods Opted out rather than being kicked off the team. I hope they bring some clarity to this. Some context: Woods would have been a redshirt sophomore with 6 catches and some special team experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KUGRDON Posted August 3, 2020 Share Posted August 3, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azgreg Posted August 3, 2020 Share Posted August 3, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBug708 Posted August 3, 2020 Share Posted August 3, 2020 Woods has sickle cell. Why on God's earth would he want to be anywhere near any football facility this year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfmanhalfbronco Posted August 3, 2020 Share Posted August 3, 2020 9 hours ago, Scorcho said: are you that naive that you think this is only a PAC-12 issue? Good point. I am sure other conferences may follow. Not sure they can make a list of demands as a conference wide voice before fall camp. It also looks like a lot of the P12 players are not buying into this and just want to play football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.