MrBug708 Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 On 2/12/2023 at 5:06 PM, HLB said: You posted UGA's football schedule. And my reply was "What's your point (in posting UGA's football schedule)"? Are you're implying that UGA has a weak schedule? If so, then I was merely showing that UCLA's schedule, which is weaker. And don't kid yourself, NO P5 team is running from playing UCLA. The title of the thread was about football schedules. I posted a football schedule. I didn't offer up any opinion of it. You clearly believed it was and felt like you needed to defend it. That's your insecurity, not mine. As for the last part. https://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/story/2019-10-25/michigan-terminates-agreement-to-play-ucla-in-football-in-2022-and-23 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 On 2/12/2023 at 6:04 PM, HLB said: UGA plays 9 P5 opponents this year, but most seasons they play 10 P5 opponents .... Eight (8) conference games, every year, along with one (1) OOC P5 opponent, in GaTech who they play in the final game of every season. But most years UGA plays two P5 OOC opponents, for a total of 10 P5 opponents. In 2013, and 2014 they played Clemson, in addition to GA Tech. In 2016 they played North Carolina. In 2017 and 2019 they played Notre Dame. In 2021 they played Clemson, and in 2022 they played Oregon. Most seasons, UGA plays 10 P5 opponents. As does South Carolina, Florida and Kentucky. In '24, '25 and '26, UGA will play two OOC P5 opponents, for 10 P5 opponents. From '26 to '33 they will play three P5 OOC opponents, for a total of eleven P5 opponents. All other SEC teams play 9P5 opponents (8 conference and 1 OOC P5 opponent). The PAC12 plays 9 conference games to reduce the number of cross-country trips that comes with playing OOC opponents. Most prospective P5 OOC opponents for the PAC12 are East of Colorado. The SEC plays 8 conference games because they are surrounded by the ACC, Big12, multiple G5 conferences where there are a larger number of prospective OOC opponents, than the PAC12, which are easily within driving range, and having to make without cross-country trips. Cool, so Oregon St. and UGA play the same number of P5 opponents next year. Tho SDSU would manhandle any of the three non-P5 teams on the Bulldogs schedule. It is funny how you're instantly on the defensive whenever your damsel-in-distress (SEC football) is in trouble from a Pac-12 message board with like 4 active members. Maybe you should seek therapy and heavy meds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HLB Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 On 2/13/2023 at 2:09 AM, MrBug708 said: The title of the thread was about football schedules. I posted a football schedule. I didn't offer up any opinion of it. You clearly believed it was and felt like you needed to defend it. That's your insecurity, not mine. As for the last part. https://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/story/2019-10-25/michigan-terminates-agreement-to-play-ucla-in-football-in-2022-and-23 The article you post is 3-1/2 years old and does not mean that Michigan (who has back-to-back CFP appearances, and 2-time B1G Champion) is "running" from UCLA and that "all P5" OOC opponents are afraid of playing UCLA. Are we to believe that UCLA couldn't secure another P5 opponent to take Michigan's place, with 3 years of lead time? As for posting Georgia's schedule - why did you post their schedule? To show how strong it is? Surely not. You didn't have to comment on why you posted, as your action speaks for itself. Why not post Purdue's schedule? Or Kansas State's schedule? Why Georgia's schedule? Clearly you were trying to demonstrate that Georgia's schedule is - in your opinion - weak. And many (including myself) agree that UGA's 2023 schedule isn't as strong as their past schedules. But to suggest that it's weak, when UCLA's schedule isn't overly strong, is silly on your part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HLB Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 On 2/14/2023 at 5:53 PM, Orange said: Cool, so Oregon St. and UGA play the same number of P5 opponents next year. Tho SDSU would manhandle any of the three non-P5 teams on the Bulldogs schedule. It is funny how you're instantly on the defensive whenever your damsel-in-distress (SEC football) is in trouble from a Pac-12 message board with like 4 active members. Maybe you should seek therapy and heavy meds. Oh - so now it's "cool"? Your original response was arrogant, and you referred to me as a "dipshit" - as if you knew more than you actually know more than me, when in fact I demonstrated that you clearly didn't know what were talking about. And after I show you that you were wrong in your claim, now you want to back down and say "cool". LOL! And I will defend any school, from any conference, when you blatantly make an ignorant statement about an institution, when you obviously don't know what you're talking about. As for SDSU - they should manhandle UT-Martin, an FCS opponent. They should beat Ball State, but they are closely matched. But in no way or manner would they beat UAB or GaTech. You're clearly attempting to belittle UGA's schedule in any way you think you can, by reaching out to somehow, someway, claim that SDSU (a team that finished 7-6 in 2022) is stronger than any of UGA's OOC opponents, in an attempt to imply that Oregon State has a stronger OOC schedule ... simply because you want to "win" a debate, which you've already lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBug708 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 On 2/14/2023 at 6:59 PM, HLB said: The article you post is 3-1/2 years old and does not mean that Michigan (who has back-to-back CFP appearances, and 2-time B1G Champion) is "running" from UCLA and that "all P5" OOC opponents are afraid of playing UCLA. Are we to believe that UCLA couldn't secure another P5 opponent to take Michigan's place, with 3 years of lead time? As for posting Georgia's schedule - why did you post their schedule? To show how strong it is? Surely not. You didn't have to comment on why you posted, as your action speaks for itself. Why not post Purdue's schedule? Or Kansas State's schedule? Why Georgia's schedule? Clearly you were trying to demonstrate that Georgia's schedule is - in your opinion - weak. And many (including myself) agree that UGA's 2023 schedule isn't as strong as their past schedules. But to suggest that it's weak, when UCLA's schedule isn't overly strong, is silly on your part. I'm not sure, nor do I care, what you believe. There was one FBS team, P5 or G5, available for that week. It was Hawaii. Michigan was already in talks with Hawaii before they even ducked out from UCLA. They could have bought out just the home game, but didn't want to play UCLA in Ann Arbor either. 3 years lead time? Schedules don't work like that if you want to schedule P5 programs. I'll chalk that up to not knowing how college football works. UCLA's next free weekend is in 2028, which would be the third weekend. They would need to find another program not locked into that week. The mental gymnastics to circle the wagons over a simple graphic is comical. I didn't offer a single opinion, didn't create a narrative, just posted the future schedule of the defending champion. Purdue, Kansas State fit neither of those and frankly, I haven't seen the schedule for either of them. Nothing is stopping you from posting them, but you seem content to further the idea that the SEC is notoriously light on scheduling. Why deflect to UCLA, Purdue, or Kansas State? Very strange. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 On 2/14/2023 at 7:12 PM, HLB said: Oh - so now it's "cool"? Your original response was arrogant, and you referred to me as a "dipshit" - as if you knew more than you actually know more than me, when in fact I demonstrated that you clearly didn't know what were talking about. And after I show you that you were wrong in your claim, now you want to back down and say "cool". LOL! And I will defend any school, from any conference, when you blatantly make an ignorant statement about an institution, when you obviously don't know what you're talking about. As for SDSU - they should manhandle UT-Martin, an FCS opponent. They should beat Ball State, but they are closely matched. But in no way or manner would they beat UAB or GaTech. You're clearly attempting to belittle UGA's schedule in any way you think you can, by reaching out to somehow, someway, claim that SDSU (a team that finished 7-6 in 2022) is stronger than any of UGA's OOC opponents, in an attempt to imply that Oregon State has a stronger OOC schedule ... simply because you want to "win" a debate, which you've already lost. I called you a dipshit because you ARE a dipshit. Glad we cleared that up. SDSU couldn't beat UAB? Why? Because UAB lost to Rice? Or because UAB lost to W. Ky, or lost to Liberty, or lost to FL Atlantic, or lost to UTSA? Ball State and SDSU are closely matched? BS went 5-7, losing to Toledo (whom SDSU beat), GA southern, and U of Ohio. And I said SDSU would beat any P5 team on UGA's schedule, which necessarily excludes Ga Tech, you no-reading dipshit. You're easily the biggest homer I've ever seen post on the Internet. And your psyche is so fragile, I wonder how you've lived to be old without having a goddamned heart attack. I wouldn't be surprised if you're a teenager who goes around telling people you're a black senior citizen to win arguments on the internet. Sad! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row Z Posted April 25 Author Share Posted April 25 Some bold comments from Leaf. I love it. I am not sure if Penix would go that high in the draft, BUT i totally agree that this upcoming Pac12 season is going to feature some excellent QB play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.