Jump to content

Mutts vs. Poultry


Quack 12

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Scscsc89 said:

So why doesn’t UW decline that third-down holding penalty in OT?

it didn’t look like Oregon had made the first down

Probably because Oregon was 3/3 on 4th and 1 and were gonna go for it 100% of the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, glduck said:

we didn’t, but I think coach pete liked his odds of 3rd and long over 4th and 1.

I thought it was the right decision. We weren’t stopping 4th and 1, especially with Johnson out.

i think the biggest mistake was for UW not to use its timeouts at end of regulation to run 3 more plays to get closer. 37 yard field goal was always iffy. Offense was moving with McGrew a little bit. Maybe one throw to the TE. 

Oh well. Congrats ducks. I think this game might mark a new chapter in the rivalry (competitive games)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, glduck said:

i’m far more surprised that petersen was so willing to rely on his kicker to win the game at regulation. they had at least 1 TO left (maybe 2? just 1? eh, whatever) and 30 seconds to play with to get closer and/or break one.

Should have tried that tall receiver in the end zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Donate

    Please donate to support this community. We appreciate all donations!

    Donate Sidebar by DevFuse
×
×
  • Create New...