Jump to content

2020 Election Thread


PapaG

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, Jalapeno said:

Taken from CNN.com

A POTUS who owns a media company...any unbiased concerns?

He has ZERO chance of being the Democratic nominee.  There's a HUGE chance you'll vote for him if he peels off and becomes an independent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Orange said:

He has ZERO chance of being the Democratic nominee.  There's a HUGE chance you'll vote for him if he peels off and becomes an independent.

He likes to tax people and have biased propaganda supports not himself and his fellow Democrats..  Even poor people he likes to tax.

He’s the perfect Democrat candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elizabeth Warren Would Rather Make You Fix Your Terrible Public School Than Let You Send Your Kid to a Charter School

 

How she expects parents to do this—particularly the poorer ones she says she wants to help—remains unclear.

In recent years, the Democratic presidential candidate has doubled down against charter schools. She adopted the stance in 2016, when (in her words) "a handful of bazillionaires" attempted to lift the cap on charters in Massachusetts. But Warren found herself in hot water last month, just a week after her NEA interview was released, when she was caught speaking misleadingly to a group of black protesters from the Powerful Parent Network, an organization that supports school choice. 

"My children went to public schools," she said, pushing back against accusations that she doesn't practice what she preaches. But her children didn't only go to public schools: As Reason Foundation's Corey DeAngelis discovered, she sent her son, Alex, to a private school from fifth grade onward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations — this is the least-biased source I remember you quoting, even if it’s still biased.

”Reason”

18300B68-F77A-4E06-9DD1-1F60FFF70A04.thumb.jpeg.a56e712f8eb7d22419d4a8eb3d036938.jpeg

I’m also concerned that you’ve stopped attributing the sources of the material you quote, as if that will help with its credibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for the policy, I agree that if you have a million dollar budget for education in an area, it’s better to put it all into fixing the school that already exists than giving up on that one to open a redundant new school that will only serve a fraction of the students you need to serve.

Sounds like what conservatives in my youth used to call “smart, efficient government”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And with charter schools, the question is where is the money coming from?

You can spend millions to fix up those schools but when you keep prayer out of schools in addition to downplaying the pledge of allegiance to the US flag, there's no hope in fixing schools.  I stood for the flag every morning growing up at school and now I keep hearing schools aren't the same as they used to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My kid’s elementary school does an amazing job with their anti-bullying programs & integrating “big/little buddy” programs within grades to foster interaction and respect — the results are quite impressive.

They do the pledge once a week, on Wednesdays.  Perhaps some teachers do it more.

I wouldn’t believe everything you hear — but you could volunteer @ your local schools if you want to check it out for yourself and help out at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/6/2019 at 4:57 PM, PapaG said:

Elizabeth Warren Would Rather Make You Fix Your Terrible Public School Than Let You Send Your Kid to a Charter School

 

How she expects parents to do this—particularly the poorer ones she says she wants to help—remains unclear.

In recent years, the Democratic presidential candidate has doubled down against charter schools. She adopted the stance in 2016, when (in her words) "a handful of bazillionaires" attempted to lift the cap on charters in Massachusetts. But Warren found herself in hot water last month, just a week after her NEA interview was released, when she was caught speaking misleadingly to a group of black protesters from the Powerful Parent Network, an organization that supports school choice. 

"My children went to public schools," she said, pushing back against accusations that she doesn't practice what she preaches. But her children didn't only go to public schools: As Reason Foundation's Corey DeAngelis discovered, she sent her son, Alex, to a private school from fifth grade onward.

So, she did send them to only private schools?  If she had, I'm sure that pathetic rag would have jumped all over it, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.foxnews.com/media/varney-uk-election-boris-johnson-victory-crushing-socialists

The Brits rejected socialism in a big way.  As long as the Deep State Party continues to try moving towards socialism, they will get rejected next November.  I have said the whole time with this upcoming election is that the Deep State Party needs to have an electable moderate if they hope to get rid of Trump.  Sadly, I do not see that moderate candidate that is electable coming out of the Deep State Party and that is why Bloomberg is running for office.  The Deep State Party needs to retreat towards the middle from this point forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.theblaze.com/news/biden-points-to-conservative-wins-in-uk-elections-as-warning-to-democrats-not-to-go-too-far-left

Joe Biden now warning the Deep State Party to not go too far left and like a DSP guy, he still insulted Boris Johnson.

The Brexit election results and its aftereffects should be good for the country as long as the DSP retreats closer to the center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jalapeno said:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/varney-uk-election-boris-johnson-victory-crushing-socialists

The Brits rejected socialism in a big way.  As long as the Deep State Party continues to try moving towards socialism, they will get rejected next November.  I have said the whole time with this upcoming election is that the Deep State Party needs to have an electable moderate if they hope to get rid of Trump.  Sadly, I do not see that moderate candidate that is electable coming out of the Deep State Party and that is why Bloomberg is running for office.  The Deep State Party needs to retreat towards the middle from this point forward.

No, they didn't.

They have nationally funded healthcare and pensions, and will continue to have that, even with a conservative party.  Hell, the conservatives RAN ON continuing to keep the NHS funded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jalapeno said:

@orange fails to get it when it comes to the big picture and is retorting to insults because he has lost the battle today.  Have a nice weekend orange punk.

When the hell did I insult you in this thread?  I understand you're mentally different, but maybe ask another member here if you're confused how things work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, glduck said:

I’d like to hear more predictions from the guy who uses the phrase “Deep State Party”, I’m sure his ideas are on the level.

Reading nothing but alt right conspiracy sights and thinking you are reading news fucks with your head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Donate

    Please donate to support this community. We appreciate all donations!

    Donate Sidebar by DevFuse
×
×
  • Create New...