Jump to content

Olympic Sports


azgreg

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, azgreg said:

 

I have to say, none of this makes any sense.  At most colleges, if donors were able to self-fund non-revenue sports, the schools would seize the chance.  Why wouldn't Stanford support the effort to reach $200 million and have all non-revenue-producing sports self funded in perpetuity?  Does anyone have the answer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...