PapaG Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 That’s some top-tier propaganda spin. Post a picture of Nader with Trump and says he was “named in the Mueller report” to paint him as a Trump ally for those who don’t bother looking into it any further. He was “named in the Mueller report” because he was a witness for Mueller, and his illegal concealed donations were to Hillary's 2016 campaign. This guy was indicted for funneling illegal campaign contributions to Democrats including Hillary Clinton. Donating to an inauguration isn’t a crime. This is the NYT article photo. Fake News to fool morons. Pac12 Squad, do any of you know you’re just followers and not free-thinkers? Also, he was a material witness for Mueller, not just someone named in that waste of money report. The dishonesty is so blatant at this point. They have given up on any semblance of journalistic integrity. It’s all propaganda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 14 hours ago, PapaG said: The exact definition of disinformation. Imagine being so stupid you don't understand the difference between paraphrasing and quoting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaG Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 Imagine what happens in a second term when even more of the money-laundering of taxpayer money to government family members and cronies gets diminished and put to good use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 I can't tell if you're the shitty Republican uncle at Thanksgiving, or just the guy who was molested by (and therefore worships) the shitty Republican uncle at Thanksgiving. But lol @ you quoting a trump lackey who begged for Mulvaney's job and didn't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quack 12 Posted December 5, 2019 Share Posted December 5, 2019 8 hours ago, PapaG said: That’s some top-tier propaganda spin. Post a picture of Nader with Trump and says he was “named in the Mueller report” to paint him as a Trump ally for those who don’t bother looking into it any further. He was “named in the Mueller report” because he was a witness for Mueller, and his illegal concealed donations were to Hillary's 2016 campaign. This guy was indicted for funneling illegal campaign contributions to Democrats including Hillary Clinton. Donating to an inauguration isn’t a crime. This is the NYT article photo. Fake News to fool morons. Pac12 Squad, do any of you know you’re just followers and not free-thinkers? Also, he was a material witness for Mueller, not just someone named in that waste of money report. The dishonesty is so blatant at this point. They have given up on any semblance of journalistic integrity. It’s all propaganda. And you failed to mention that he and his cohort Khawaga also funneled $1M to the Trump inauguration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scscsc89 Posted December 6, 2019 Author Share Posted December 6, 2019 I just don’t understand how these people are predicting a Trump landslide. oh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azgreg Posted December 6, 2019 Share Posted December 6, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scscsc89 Posted December 6, 2019 Author Share Posted December 6, 2019 “The country today is so divided ... I wonder why” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaG Posted December 6, 2019 Share Posted December 6, 2019 Rachel Maddow is being sued by OAN for falsely claiming that they are paid Russian propagandists. Her defense is that she is a liar who makes things up so she didn’t really mean it. This is the American Left and the Pac12 Squad in a nutshell. https://timesofsandiego.com/business/2019/12/02/rachel-maddow-faces-slapdown-by-uc-linguistics-professor-in-defamation-suit/ Maddow lawyer Theodore J. “Ted” Boutrous Jr. argued that the liberal host was clearly offering up her “own unique expression” of her views to capture what she saw as the “ridiculous” nature of the undisputed facts. “Her comment, therefore, is a quintessential statement ‘of rhetorical hyperbole, incapable of being proved true or false,’” he said. There he is, straight up admitting she engages in “rhetorical hyperbole, incapable of being proved true or false.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Posted December 6, 2019 Share Posted December 6, 2019 38 minutes ago, PapaG said: Rachel Maddow is being sued by OAN for falsely claiming that they are paid Russian propagandists. Her defense is that she is a liar who makes things up so she didn’t really mean it. This is the American Left and the Pac12 Squad in a nutshell. https://timesofsandiego.com/business/2019/12/02/rachel-maddow-faces-slapdown-by-uc-linguistics-professor-in-defamation-suit/ Maddow lawyer Theodore J. “Ted” Boutrous Jr. argued that the liberal host was clearly offering up her “own unique expression” of her views to capture what she saw as the “ridiculous” nature of the undisputed facts. “Her comment, therefore, is a quintessential statement ‘of rhetorical hyperbole, incapable of being proved true or false,’” he said. There he is, straight up admitting she engages in “rhetorical hyperbole, incapable of being proved true or false.” Anyone can sue anyone, dumbfuck. And this one will be tossed before the ink is dry: Lawyers for Maddow’s employers, including Comcast, said OAN didn’t dispute that for more than four years Kristian Brunovich Rouz wrote about 1,300 articles for the Russian news agency Sputnik and that “Sputnik News is affiliated with the Russian government.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scscsc89 Posted December 6, 2019 Author Share Posted December 6, 2019 3 hours ago, PapaG said: Rachel Maddow is being sued by OAN for falsely claiming that they are paid Russian propagandists. This is at least the third time you have tried to use a conservative group suing someone as proof that something bad must've happened to warrant such a lawsuit. I would like to give you credit in understanding why that is specious & that they do it exactly to fool people who don't know better. Please don't let them take you for a fool. #BeBetter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaG Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAC MAN Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 When will the Feds finally go after Silicon Valley? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Posted December 9, 2019 Share Posted December 9, 2019 29 minutes ago, PapaG said: What's your point? You think twitter is in the tank for Dems? They let that hardened diarrhea stain in the White House threaten nuclear war and bully war heroes via twitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scscsc89 Posted December 9, 2019 Author Share Posted December 9, 2019 Look at the 250,000 accounts that ❤️ Trump's tweets within seconds of posting & then tell me how Twitter doesn't help him. @Robbin12345678 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaG Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 The Schiff memo in 2018 in response to the Nunes memo was riddled with lies and false statements. I’d say that Democrats should be ashamed, but liars have no shame.The Democratic minority on the committee, then led by Rep. Adam Schiff, put out a response memo with competing claims: FBI and DOJ officials did not omit material information from the FISA warrant. The DOJ “made only narrow use of information from Steele’s sources about Page’s specific activities in 2016.” In subsequent FISA renewals, DOJ provided additional information that corroborated Steele’s reporting. The Page FISA warrant allowed the FBI to collect “valuable intelligence.” “Far from ‘omitting’ material facts about Steele, as the Majority claims, DOJ repeatedly informed the Court about Steele’s background, credibility, and potential bias.” The FBI conducted a “rigorous process” to vet Steele’s allegations, and the Page FISA application explained the FBI’s reasonable basis for finding Steele credible. Steele’s prior reporting was used in “criminal proceedings.” Each of these claims were found by Horowitz to be false. Democrat voters love to be lied to and supports liars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 1 hour ago, PapaG said: The Schiff memo in 2018 in response to the Nunes memo was riddled with lies and false statements. I’d say that Democrats should be ashamed, but liars have no shame.The Democratic minority on the committee, then led by Rep. Adam Schiff, put out a response memo with competing claims: FBI and DOJ officials did not omit material information from the FISA warrant. The DOJ “made only narrow use of information from Steele’s sources about Page’s specific activities in 2016.” In subsequent FISA renewals, DOJ provided additional information that corroborated Steele’s reporting. The Page FISA warrant allowed the FBI to collect “valuable intelligence.” “Far from ‘omitting’ material facts about Steele, as the Majority claims, DOJ repeatedly informed the Court about Steele’s background, credibility, and potential bias.” The FBI conducted a “rigorous process” to vet Steele’s allegations, and the Page FISA application explained the FBI’s reasonable basis for finding Steele credible. Steele’s prior reporting was used in “criminal proceedings.” Each of these claims were found by Horowitz to be false. Democrat voters love to be lied to and supports liars. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/internal-justice-watchdog-finds-russia-probe-was-justified-not-biased-n1098161 Yet this is still 100% factual. *YAWN* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scscsc89 Posted December 12, 2019 Author Share Posted December 12, 2019 For those that may be unsure what Horowitz report found: The FBI mishandled parts of its application to monitor a Trump campaign aide as it was probing possible Russian interference in the 2016 election, but the overall investigation was justified, according to a long-awaited report by the Justice Department's watchdog that rebuts the president's depiction of a politically biased plot against him. The 434-page report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz concluded that the FBI and the Justice Department launched their investigation into the 2016 campaign not for political reasons, but because of evidence the Russian government was using cutouts to reach out to the Trump campaign as part of its efforts to influence the election. The inspector general said he examined more than a million documents and interviewed more than 100 witnesses. Horowitz found that political bias did not taint the actions of former FBI leaders who have frequently been the subject of presidential attacks on Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaG Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 Obama appointee Horowitz destroyed this Fake News propaganda. Idiots still believe in the Steele Dossier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quack 12 Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 1 hour ago, PapaG said: Obama appointee Horowitz destroyed this Fake News propaganda. Idiots still believe in the Steele Dossier. As usual, you've been duped - AGAIN! Watch the chyron along the bottom and the advertising. Some of this video is from 2018, some from 2017, some probably from earlier. You'll believe anything on your FB feed, is that it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.