Jump to content

C/O 2018 Recruiting


MrBug708

Recommended Posts

On 12/29/2017 at 8:43 PM, MrBug708 said:

Jake Browning is a much better QB than Jake Locker ever was, but Locker went 8th overall.

Locker didn't have half the talent around him Browning has.  Put Browning on those UW teams, and it would get ugly for him real fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 500
  • Created
  • Last Reply
14 hours ago, MrBug708 said:

That doesn't invalidate my point. Browning is still a better QB, but Locker can make plays with his legs more so, but Brownings arm looks like Jeff George's compared to Locker

Huh?  Locker had a cannon for an arm and was a pitcher with a 90+ mph fastball HS but had terrible accuracy.  Signed a minor league baseball contract as well but didn't play after he chose football.

Browning has an "accurate" arm, to put it nicely.

 Did you confuse the two?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, glduck said:

chip actually brought in some really great OL talent that’s doing really well in the nfl, the size thing was only ever noticeable against the elite of the elite SEC d-lines.

Chip liked tall, skinny guys on both lines because he couldn't get beasts to UO since he didn't have the recruiting contacts in the Deep South.  He can probably change that up and get a few SoCal guys that USC has owned for years, but zone blocking does those guys no favors on offense, and huge d-line guys don't work well when you're on the field 80 snaps a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/12/2018 at 8:15 AM, PapaG said:

Chip liked tall, skinny guys on both lines because he couldn't get beasts to UO since he didn't have the recruiting contacts in the Deep South.  He can probably change that up and get a few SoCal guys that USC has owned for years, but zone blocking does those guys no favors on offense, and huge d-line guys don't work well when you're on the field 80 snaps a game.

That's not entirely true.  He liked smaller OL, it wasn't that he couldn't get bigger guys, Bellotti had some big OL.  It was that he wanted OL that didn't get wore out by going so fast.  He use to say he wanted bullets not boulers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RogueDuck said:

That's not entirely true.  He liked smaller OL, it wasn't that he couldn't get bigger guys, Bellotti had some big OL.  It was that he wanted OL that didn't get wore out by going so fast.  He use to say he wanted bullets not boulers.

Fair enough as Chip's o-line philosophy in college has been for mobile OL who zone block.  The issue was playing against beasts on the d-line, but every offense struggles against a great defense, so I never understood why Chip's offense got criticized when it didn't roll over great defenses.  Great defenses stop everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...