PapaG Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 5 minutes ago, Orange said: Try on the truth, dumbfuck. It won't hurt you: https://www.snopes.com/ap/2019/09/23/the-story-behind-bidens-son-ukraine-and-trumps-claims/ WASHINGTON (AP) — In 2014, then-Vice President Joe Biden was at the forefront of American diplomatic efforts to support Ukraine’s fragile democratic government as it sought to fend off Russian aggression and root out corruption. So it raised eyebrows when Biden’s son Hunter was hired by a Ukrainian gas company. The Obama White House said at the time that there was no conflict because the younger Biden was a private citizen. And there’s been no evidence of wrongdoing by either Biden. ... The matter, however, has continued to be questioned by Trump and his allies. They’ve pointed in particular to Biden’s move in March 2016 to pressure the Ukrainian government to fire its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who had previously led an investigation into Burisma’s owner. Biden was representing the official position of the U.S. government, a position that was also supported by other Western governments and many in Ukraine, who accused Shokin of being soft on corruption. Corruption has continued to fester in Ukraine. In May, the country’s new president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, came into office with no political experience but with bold promises to put an end to the corrupt practices. So, Obama’s foreign policy was based on quid pro quos and withholding aid. Thanks for the confirmation. Also, Snopes says there is no evidence of wrongdoing prior to any investigation. Dipshits can see that glaring disinformation, but you can’t. Wow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quack 12 Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 11 minutes ago, PapaG said: A partisan Democrat who worked for Biden, Obama, and Brennan is the leaker, and Schiff’s staff worked with him and Liddle Adam lies about it. These are facts. It's really sad that you actually believe these are facts. These are not facts, they are conjecture and speculation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaG Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 Just now, Quack 12 said: It's really sad that you actually believe these are facts. These are not facts, they are conjecture and speculation. Eric CIA-ramella is a partisan Democrat who worked with Biden, Obama, and Brennan. Facts. He’s obviously the leaker who was coached by the Schiff team and now they can’t have him testify because Schiff got fooled by him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quack 12 Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 7 minutes ago, PapaG said: partisan Democrat Again, you don't know what a fact is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scscsc89 Posted November 5, 2019 Author Share Posted November 5, 2019 once again: ... except if everything the whistleblower has warned us about has been corroborated by other witnesses and the transcript summary, it doesn’t really matter who he/she is. The extortion, abuse of presidential power & obstruction are what matter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaG Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, Quack 12 said: Again, you don't know what a fact is. He’s a registered Democrat. That’s a fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaG Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 3 minutes ago, Scscsc89 said: once again: ... except if everything the whistleblower has warned us about has been corroborated by other witnesses and the transcript summary, it doesn’t really matter who he/she is. The abuse of presidential power & obstruction are what matter Yes, defending oneself against a bogus political impeachment based on a leaker who won’t testify is now obstruction. Are you mentally disabled? The moronic far left is handing Trump 2020 on a silver platter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scscsc89 Posted November 5, 2019 Author Share Posted November 5, 2019 11 minutes ago, PapaG said: Yes, defending oneself against a bogus political impeachment based on a leaker who won’t testify is now obstruction. Whistleblowers don’t have to testify — especially when their reports have been corroborated by other witnesses & evidence. you’d think someone smart as yourself would understand that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 26 minutes ago, PapaG said: The moronic far left is handing Trump 2020 on a silver platter. If that's the case, why aren't you cheering on the democrats, you fucking pussy-ass liar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quack 12 Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 I don't know how or why you know this person's political affiliation, but to call someone "partisan" as a statement of fact is indicative of how ludicrously biased you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 55 minutes ago, PapaG said: Yes, defending oneself against a bogus political impeachment based on a leaker who won’t testify is now obstruction. Literally every impeachment is "political" you retarded piece of shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 How much of a fucking clueless piece of shit do you have to be to support trump and say anything about Hunter Biden and nepotism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruin 70 Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 8 minutes ago, Orange said: How much of a fucking clueless piece of shit do you have to be to support trump and say anything about Hunter Biden and nepotism? Oh wow that was so useful KC. Running out of threats and ill wishes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azgreg Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glduck Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 At this point the whistleblower could be Hunter Biden himself and it wouldn’t matter one iota. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scscsc89 Posted November 5, 2019 Author Share Posted November 5, 2019 "amended his testimony" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mano Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 33 minutes ago, Scscsc89 said: "amended his testimony" Short for "caught in a lie, and covering his ass before Trump throws him under a bus." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azgreg Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 34 minutes ago, Scscsc89 said: "amended his testimony" Translation: Got caught lying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glduck Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 Apparently we’ve reached the “yeah he’s guilty as shit but I don’t give a fuck” point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaG Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 1 hour ago, azgreg said: What’s wrong with this, other than exposing Democrat corruption? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.